you will 1 apply a framework for priority setting to population health data 2 integrate the public health evidence principles of public health with practical problems and 3 critically analyse public health- College Paper Lab | collegepaperslab.com

College Paper Lab

you will 1 apply a framework for priority setting to population health data 2 integrate the public health evidence principles of public health with practical problems and 3 critically analyse public health- College Paper Lab | collegepaperslab.com

In Assessment 2 you conducted a health inequality audit for a zone from the Social Health Atlas. In your audit you uncovered inequalities in several health indicators. For Assessment 3, you will write a report on the factors that may influence priority setting for these health indicators in your zone. Key factors influencing priority setting may include:

● The scale of the problem

● Alignment with governments’ priorities and targets

● Financial cost

● Potential to produce improvement

● Strength of evidence base.

The report must contain:

● Introduction of factors influencing priority setting including data comparison addressing social determinants of health; Identifying the scale of the problem; evidence of reading three recommended papers

● Discussion of factors influencing priority setting including aligning the priority with governments’ priorities and targets; assessing the financial cost; potential to produce improvement; Strength of evidence base; Other factors considered;

● High quality presentation, in terms of format, meeting general requirements for task; coherence of expression; and adherence to conventions of writing (spelling, grammar, length) and referencing

Learn more about priority setting in these 3 papers. You are expected to refer to these 3 papers in your report:

• Viergever et al. (2010). A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practice. Health Research Policy and Systems, 8:36 Retrieved from http://www.healthpolicy-systems.com/content/8/1/36

• Persad et al. (2009). Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions. Lancet, 373: 423– 31 Retrieved from http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60137- 9/fulltext

• MacDonald and Ollerenshaw (2011). Priority setting in primary health care: a framework for local catchments. Rural and Remote Health, 11: 1714. Retrieved from https://www.rrh.org.au/journal/article/1714

Weighting: 40%

Length and/or format: 2000 words

Purpose: To consider factors associated with priority setting Learning outcomes assessed: 2, 3, 4, 5 How to submit: Turnitin (via the PUBH610 LEO page) Return of assignment: Marks and feedback will be made available via LEO.

Assessment criteria: See Appendix II for marking rubrics. Other assessment task instructions will be made available via LEO as necessary

Rubric Assessment 3: Priority setting assessment Criteria Standard achieved Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor Criterion 1 Introduction of factors influencing priority setting including data comparison addressing social determinants of health; Identifying the scale of the problem; evidence of reading three recommended papers LO2: population vs individual health; LO3: critique role of public health principles in improving health LO4: critically evaluate public health problems with tools used in practice. Excellent introduction of factors influencing priority setting for health indicators selected including the quality of comparative epidemiological data to identify priority health needs, the underlying social, economic and political conditions that shape the production and distribution of health and the scale of the health indicator; evidence of close reading of three set papers. Comprehensive introduction of factors influencing priority setting for health indicators selected including the quality of comparative data sets; the underlying high level conditions that shape the production and distribution of health and the scale of the health indicator; evidence of close reading of three set papers. Good introduction of factors influencing priority setting for health indicators selected including data comparison, social determinants and the scale of the problems; evidence of reading of three set papers. Satisfactory introduction of factors influencing priority setting for health indicators selected is included but is not detailed, relevant or well informed by the set readings. Unsatisfactory introduction of factors influencing priority setting; poor reading and preparation; limited critical thinking; has clearly not read set readings. (12.88-15 marks) (11.25-12.87 marks) (9.75-11.24 marks) (7.5-9.74 marks) (0– 7.4 marks) Criterion 2 Discussion of factors influencing priority setting including aligning the priority with governments’ priorities and targets; assessing the financial cost; potential to produce improvement; Strength of evidence base; Other factors considered; evidence of reading three recommended papers LO2: population vs individual health; LO3: critique role of public health principles in improving health. LO4: critically evaluate public health problems with tools used in practice. Excellent discussion of factors influencing priority setting for health indicators selected including alignment with the priorities of other stakeholders, consideration of costs, impact and the evidence base; evidence of close reading of three set papers. Comprehensive discussion of factors influencing priority setting for health indicators selected including alignment with the priorities of other stakeholders, consideration of costs, impact and the evidence base; evidence of close reading of three set papers. Good discussion of factors influencing priority setting for health indicators selected including alignment with the priorities of other stakeholders, consideration of costs, impact and the evidence base; evidence of reading of three set papers. Discussion of factors influencing priority setting for health indicators selected is included but is not detailed, relevant or well informed by the set readings. Unsatisfactory discussion of factors influencing priority setting; poor reading and preparation; limited critical thinking; has clearly not read set readings. (17-20 marks) (15-16.9 marks) (13-14.9 marks) (10-12.9 marks) (0-9.9 marks) Criterion 3 Report is of an appropriate academic standard for a postgraduate public health student, in terms of format; meeting general requirements for task; coherently expressed; and adheres to conventions of writing (spelling, grammar, length) and appropriately referenced LO5: apply knowledge to practice in integrated and appropriate manner Report is of a high academic standard in every respect: formatting; meets general requirements for task; coherent; appropriate length; free of spelling/grammatical errors and referencing Report is of a high professional standard in most respects: formatting; meets general requirements for task; coherent; appropriate length; free of spelling/grammatical errors and referencing Report is of an acceptable professional standard, but requires minor revision with respect to one (or more) of the following: formatting; meets general requirements for task; coherent; appropriate length; free of spelling/grammatical errors or referencing Report almost at a professional standard, requiring major revision with respect to one (or more) of the following: formatting; meets general requirements for task; not adherent to length instructions; coherent; free of spelling/grammatical errors or referencing Report not of a professional standard, requiring extensive revision due to problems with one (or more) of the following: formatting; meets general requirements for task; not adherent to length instructions; coherent; free of spelling/grammatical errors or referencing (4.25 – 5 marks) (3.75-4.24 marks) (3.25-3.74 marks) (2.5-3.24 marks) (0–2.49 marks) Total marks available: 40 (LO2 = 15 marks; LO3 = 10 marks; LO4 = 10 marks; LO5 = 5 marks)

College Paper Lab – Check our website for more...

 

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW

Disclaimer: It is illegal to use the research material ordered on this website for other than research purposes. You must quote the sources appropriately. The company bears no responsibility for the use of research work, not intended for education use, the work is sold as-is with the highest quality and service available and written by freelancers. #Domyhomework #studygram #essaywriting #paperwriting #academicwriting #homeworkhelp #homeworkhelper #essayhelp #homeworkhelpservice #examtips #onlinedegree #onlineclasses #freelancerwriting #expertwriters #philosophywriters #assignmenthelp #onlineassignmenthelp #assignmenthelpaustralia #programmingassignmenthelp #matlabassignmenthelp #managementassignmenthelp #engineeringassignmenthelp #computerassignmenthelp #civilassignmenthelp #mechanicalassignmenthelp #lawassignmenthelp #nursingassignmenthelp #bestassignmenthelp #myassignmenthelp